Agent Execution Layer · Open Source

LLMs plan.
Ploston executes.

Stop paying for LLMs to orchestrate your tools. Define deterministic YAML workflows. Let agents call them as MCP tools. Predictable, testable, reproducible.

75–90%
token cost reduction
100%
deterministic outputs
1
LLM call per workflow

LLM-driven orchestration is fundamentally broken

Letting an LLM decide every tool call at runtime introduces compounding costs, non-determinism, and opacity at exactly the layer that needs to be reliable.

💸

Token cost explosion

Every tool call returns a result to the LLM, which re-reads context before calling the next tool. A 5-step workflow can consume 10,000+ tokens where 600 would suffice.

🎲

Non-deterministic behavior

The same request produces different tool sequences. You can't unit test it, you can't replay it, and you can't guarantee compliance. That's not production software — it's a roulette wheel.

🕳️

Zero auditability

When an agent fails mid-workflow, debugging means deciphering opaque LLM reasoning. No trace. No replay. No way to tell ops, legal, or security exactly what happened.

❌ hallucinated tool sequences · ❌ 10,000+ tokens per workflow · ❌ same input → different output · ❌ no audit trail · ❌ impossible to unit test · ❌ can't comply with enterprise policy · ❌ hallucinated tool sequences · ❌ 10,000+ tokens per workflow · ❌ same input → different output · ❌ no audit trail · ❌ impossible to unit test · ❌ can't comply with enterprise policy ·

Every step bounces through the LLM

The LLM acts as planner and executor — receiving tool results, deciding the next call, and re-reading the full context at each step. Costs and latency compound with every action.

agent-execution-flow
AGENT EXECUTION FLOW 1 user sends request 2 prompt + tools list 3 tool call 4 invoke tool 5 tool call result 6 pass tools result back 7 synthesize answer 8 final response 👤 User REQUEST 🤖 Agent ORCHESTRATOR 🧠 LLM PLANS EACH STEP 🔧 Tools MCP SERVERS Steps 2–7 repeat for every tool — each iteration burns more tokens ploston.ai

Steps 2→3→4→5→6→7 repeat for every tool in the chain — each costing more tokens than the last.

The difference is dramatic

Same task: extract links from BBC and create a reminder for each. With Ploston, the LLM makes one call instead of twelve — and the result is identical every time.

without-ploston · 12 LLM roundtrips · ~18,000 tokens
BBC LINK EXTRACTION — WITHOUT PLOSTON 1 Extract BBC links for Christmas and create a reminder for each 2 prompt + tool list 3 Call firecrawl 4 call firecrawl 5 300 links returned 6 pass 300 links 7 issues 150 calls~ 8 150 tool calls 9 tools respond 10 each result up 11 context overflow 12 reports failure 👤 User REQUEST 🤖 Agent ORCHESTRATOR 🧠 LLM DECIDES EACH STEP 🔧 Tools MCP SERVERS RESULT 12 LLM roundtrips ~18,000 tokens non-deterministic FAILS ploston.ai
WITHOUT PLOSTON
12 LLM roundtrips · ~18,000 tokens · non-deterministic · no audit trail
→
WITH PLOSTON
1 workflow call · ~2,000 tokens · deterministic · full trace

Built for production. Loved by developers.

📉 Economics

75–90% Token Savings

Multi-step workflows execute inside Ploston with zero LLM roundtrips. The agent calls once; Ploston handles every downstream step. Token costs collapse.

🎯 Reliability

Deterministic by Design

Same inputs always produce the same outputs. No reasoning variance, no hallucinated steps, no surprises in production. Write tests. Build with confidence.

📝 Developer UX

YAML Workflows + GitOps

Workflows are code. Version control, code review, CI/CD pipelines, rollback. Your existing engineering culture just works — no visual builder lock-in required.

🔒 Security

Self-Hosted & Air-Gapped

Runs entirely in your infrastructure. Your data never leaves your environment. Supports Docker, Kubernetes, and air-gapped deployments.

🔬 Quality

Fully Testable Agents

Unit test workflows like any other code. Replay executions offline. Simulate edge cases. For the first time, agent behavior is verifiable before it ships.

🌐 Ecosystem

Open MCP Ecosystem

Ploston proxies calls to any MCP server — filesystem, GitHub, Slack, databases, and the entire growing open ecosystem. Workflows become MCP tools themselves.

Three steps to deterministic agents

01

Define a YAML workflow

Write your multi-step tool sequence as a declarative YAML file. Steps, inputs, outputs, conditions — all version-controlled alongside your code.

02

Ploston exposes it as an MCP tool

Ploston registers the workflow as a named MCP tool. Your agent — Claude, GPT, any MCP client — discovers it automatically alongside native tools.

03

Agent calls once. Ploston handles the rest.

The LLM issues a single tool call. Ploston executes every step deterministically, handles retries, collects results, and returns one clean output.

Step 1 → Your workflow definition

# workflows/bbc-link-reminders.yaml
name: bbc-link-reminders
version: "1.0"
description: Extract links and create reminders

inputs:
  - source_url
  - keyword

steps:
  - id: crawl
    tool: firecrawl_scrape
    params:
      url: "{{ inputs.source_url }}"

  - id: filter
    depends_on: [crawl]
    code: |
      links = context.steps["crawl"].output.get("links", [])
      keyword = context.inputs["keyword"].lower()
      result = [l for l in links if keyword in l.get("title", "").lower()]

  - id: remind
    depends_on: [filter]
    code: |
      links = context.steps["filter"].output
      for link in links:
          await context.tools.call_mcp("reminders", "create_reminder", {
              "title": link["title"], "url": link["href"],
          })
      result = f"{len(links)} reminders created"

output: "{{ steps.remind.output }}"

Step 3 → What your agent sees

MCP tool registry
⚡
bbc-link-reminders
Extract links from a URL and create a reminder for each matching result
LLM issues exactly one call
// LLM tool call — that's it.
{
  "tool":  "bbc-link-reminders",
  "inputs": {
    "source_url": "https://bbc.com",
    "keyword":    "Christmas"
  }
}

// Ploston executes crawl → filter → remind
// Returns: "7 reminders created"
✓ 1 LLM call instead of 12. Deterministic. Full trace. Testable. Reusable by any agent in your stack.

Not a framework.
Not a gateway.
An Execution Layer.

Infrastructure evolved to separate concerns: Terraform replaced manual provisioning, Kubernetes replaced imperative ops, Temporal replaced ad-hoc workflows. Agent systems are next.

Ploston is the deterministic execution layer between LLM intent and tool action — the missing primitive that makes AI agents production-grade.

Read the architecture docs
Aspect
LLM-driven
Ploston
Execution
LLM decides at runtime
YAML, deterministic
Token cost
High (per-step)
75–90% lower
Testability
Cannot unit test
Fully testable
Auditability
Opaque LLM reasoning
Complete trace
Governance
None
Policy enforcement
Deployment
Cloud dependency
Self-hosted, air-gapped
Ecosystem
Proprietary connectors
Open MCP ecosystem
⭐ Open Source

Built in the open.

Ploston is open source. Star the repo, open issues, read the code, or contribute.

View on GitHub Join the Discussion